Drawing for DIDGE

USPTO serial 90891522

DIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel C. Neustadt

Daniel C. Neustadt HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17th Street NW, Suite 1100c/o Holland & Knight LLPWashington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Installed and embedded software for use in the field of robotics for autonomously capturing data and completing tasks in various industrial settings, sold as a component of mobile industrial robots and as a component of charging stations for mobile industrial robotsACTIVE—
009Downloadable software and hardware for use in the field of robotics for autonomously capturing data and completing tasks in various industrial settings; Installed and embedded software for use in the field of robotics for autonomously capturing data and completing tasks in various industrial settings, sold as a component of mech network radios for mobile industrial robots' communicationACTIVE—
042Online, non-downloadable software for use in the field of robotics for sharing and analyzing captured data in various industrial settings; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in the field of robotics for sharing and analyzing captured data in various industrial settingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 9, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2023ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 2023PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 1, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 7, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2022ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 13, 2022PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 25, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance