Drawing for REST INDEX TESTING

USPTO serial 90893148

REST INDEX TESTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANGOTTI, SALVATORE JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REST INDEX TESTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine M.C. Farrelly

Catherine M.C. Farrelly FRANKFURT, KURNIT, KLEIN & SELZ P.C.28 LIBERTY STREETNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture; beds; bed frames; mattresses; pillows; bolsters; feather beds; futon mattresses; mattress cushions; mattress foundations; mattress toppers; box springsACTIVE—
024Bed sheets and linens; duvet covers; pillow cases used in the bedding; bed blankets; mattress covers; mattress pads; Baby bedding, namely, fitted crib sheets, crib skirts and crib blanketsACTIVE—
035Retail store services and online retail store services featuring beds, bed sheets and linens, pillow cases, blankets, mattresses, pillows, bolsters, feather beds, futon mattresses, mattress cushions, mattress foundations, mattress toppers and box springs; Retail stores in the fields of mattresses and sleep productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance