USPTO serial 90894160
FILLUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FILLUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph M. Konieczny, Sr.
Joseph M. Konieczny, Sr. RYDER, MAZZEO & KONIECZNY LLCP.O. BOX 670PLYMOUTH MEETING, PA 19462UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Liquid handling equipment for scientific and clinical application, namely, pipette controllers; accessories for pipette controllers, namely replacement tissue culture nosepieces and pipette controller filters; laboratory pipettes, namely, glass, plastic, and plastic coated pipettes, injection pipettes, sequencing pipettes, calibrated micropipettes and polymer chain reaction (PCR) pipettes; laboratory equipment, namely, microdispensers, manifolds for microdispensers, liquid injectors; laboratory equipment, namely, accessories for liquid injectors, namely, universal adapters and support bases; liquid sample collection tubes for laboratory purposes; laboratory equipment, namely, glass and plastic hematocrit tubes and capillary tubes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |