USPTO serial 90900948
KING PILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KING PILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Holderness, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIM D. CHHEDA
TIM D. CHHEDA SELMAN MUNSON & LERNERSUITE 8759821 KATY FREEWAY, SUITE 875HOUSTON, TX 77024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL SHEET PILES, METAL SHEET PILE SECTIONS, AND METAL SHEET PILE CONNECTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |