USPTO serial 90903976
SOCIAL DIGITAL TWIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOCIAL DIGITAL TWIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan M. House
Dyan M. House BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1900 N PEARL ST., SUITE 1500DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer servers; computer hardware for data storage; computer peripheral devices; downloadable computer software for digitizing data about dynamics of society, from micro to macro, and for analyzing data to solve various social problems; downloadable computer software for warehousing and managing data about diverse knowledge and technologies from different fields, including humanities and social sciences | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services; computer rental services; server hosting; rental of web servers; optimization services for computers, namely, computer network configuration and computer software configuration; installation of computer software; maintenance and upgrading of computer software, namely, enhancing functions of computer software, changing or adding functions of computer software, and providing information thereon; providing technical information about computers, computer software and computer networks; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for digitizing data about dynamics of society, from micro to macro, and for analyzing data to solve various social problems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for warehousing and managing data about diverse knowledge and technologies from different fields, including humanities and social sciences; platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring software for digitizing data about dynamics of society, from micro to macro, and for analyzing data to solve various social problems; Platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring software for warehousing and managing data about diverse knowledge and technologies from different fields, including humanities and social sciences;providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software software for digitizing data about dynamics of society, from micro to macro, and for analyzing data to solve various social problems; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for warehousing and managing data about diverse knowledge and technologies from different fields, including humanities and social sciences | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |