Drawing for INTELLICHECK

USPTO serial 90904752

INTELLICHECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUIZ SANTIAGO, REBECCA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLICHECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

Lauri S. Thompson GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP10845 GRIFFITH PEAK DRIVESUITE 600LAS VEGAS, NV 89135

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic identification document authentication systems, for verifying the legitimacy of identification documents, namely, computer hardware and downloadable software for detecting and verifying printed and encoded information contained within an identification document against a data repository of issuer identification document information for identification document authentication purposes; downloadable computer software that records and reports data related to the authenticity of an identification document; Downloadable software application for use with computers, mobile phones and handheld devices that permits users to scan, read, store, and analyze identity information found in drivers' licenses and personal identity cards; downloadable computer software for use in preventing fraud and identity theft; downloadable mobile software application and wireless electronic hand held devices used at entry points and within facilities for use in scanning identification documents, for verifying the legitimacy of identification documents using software that interacts with a computer database; computer hardware; Downloadable software application for accepting and routing identity documentation information to 3rd party services to determine trustworthiness of the presented identification documentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2025EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2025EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 17, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2025EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2025EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 25, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2025EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 27, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 13, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 13, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2024NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2024DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 4, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 6, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2021MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2021TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Aug 31, 2021PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance