Drawing for CHECKABLE MEDICAL

USPTO serial 90975175

CHECKABLE MEDICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHECKABLE MEDICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Smyth

Matthew J. Smyth Headland Law & Strategy6230 Hwy 65 NE, Ste 102Minneapolis, MN 55432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Analyzing and compiling business data for use in connection with infectious disease testing; Analyzing and compiling business data for use for infectious disease data and information managementACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in connection with infectious disease testing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use for infectious disease data and information management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in connection with infectious disease testing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use for infectious disease data and information management; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use use in connection with infectious disease testing; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use use for infectious disease data and information managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 7, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2021ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 21, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 6, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2021PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 12, 2021TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance