USPTO serial 90976885
HEROES & VILLAINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, KATHERINE AILEEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEROES & VILLAINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KarreemWashington
299 BROADWAY, STE. 1405NEW YORK CITY, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game instruction manuals; Downloadable computer game programmes; Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable computer operating software; Downloadable electronic game software; Downloadable video and computer game programs; Downloadable video game programs; Downloadable video game software; Downloadable mobile applications for desktops, laptops and mobile devices; Downloadable electronic game software for use on desktops, laptops and mobile devices | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2022 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |