USPTO serial 90977527
B BOUNCE BACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, PETER T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B BOUNCE BACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L CORDANI
JOHN L CORDANI ROBINSON & COLE LLP280 TRUMBULL STREETHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aerated fruit juices; Aerated juices, namely, fruit juices; Aerated mineral waters; Aerated water; Alcohol free beverages, namely, non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Beverages containing vitamins, namely, drinking water; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, water-based beverages; Preparations for making beverages, namely, powders used in the preparation of fruit-based beverages; Whey beverages; Carbonated non-alcoholic drinks; Carbonated soft drinks; Carbonated water; Concentrates for use in the preparation of soft drinks; Drinking mineral water; Drinking spring water; Drinking water; Drinking water with vitamins; Drinking waters; Flavored mineral water; Flavored waters; Flavoured beers; Non-alcoholic, flavoured carbonated beverages; Flavoured mineral water; Flavoured waters; Fruit juice for use as beverages; Fruit juices; Fruit nectars; Fruit nectars, nonalcoholic; Fruit nectars, non-alcoholic; Fruit smoothies; Fruit squashes; Fruit-based beverages; Fruit-flavored soft drinks; Fruit-flavoured beverages; Non-alcoholic, functional water-based beverages; Isotonic beverages; Low calorie soft drinks; Powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Protein-enriched sports beverages; Quinine water; Soda pops; Soda water; Soft drinks; Soft drinks flavored with tea; Soft drinks for energy supply; Sparkling water; Sports drinks; Sports drinks containing electrolytes; Spring water; Syrups for making fruit-flavored drinks; Syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages; Syrups for making soft drinks; Syrups for making whey-based beverages; Syrups used in the preparation of soft drinks; Table water; Table waters; Tomato juice; Tonic water; Vitamin enriched sparkling water; Vitamin fortified non-alcoholic beverages, namely, sports drinks enhanced with vitamins; Water beverages; Water beverages enhanced with minerals; Water, namely, water beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |