USPTO serial 90978515
VIRILITYRESTORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLERY, TIMOTHY JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRILITYRESTORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and surgical apparatus, instruments and devices, including active and non-active medical implants, namely, medical implants comprising artificial material; medical and surgical apparatus, instruments and devices intended for use inside the mammal or human body, in particular medical implants comprising artificial material; medical and surgical apparatus, instruments and devices for replacing and adding one or more bodily functions and parts inside the body, namely, medical implants comprising artificial material; medical wireless communication systems and wireless powering systems for instruments, apparatus and devices, in particular for active implants, namely, implants consisting of artificial materials, and a wireless transmitter and a receiver as an integral component of a surgical implant; medical and surgical apparatus, instruments and devices, namely, active implants consisting primarily of artificial materials, designed to be capable of wireless programming, wireless controlling, wireless communicating and wireless energizing, and containing in their hardware at least one wireless transmitter and at least one receiver as an integral component of the surgical implant; surgical instruments in particular to be used during operations of active or non-active medical implants; Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical or veterinary use for use in implant surgeries; surgical apparatus, instruments and devices for medical use, for implanting orthopaedic joint implants; medical implants made of artificial materials, capable of collecting, receiving, sending, storing, preparing, controlling, analyzing and processing of data and energy to and from said medical implants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |