USPTO serial 90978821
BJ'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BJ'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER D. CASAVALE
CHRISTOPHER D. CASAVALE NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLPSUITE 2300, IP DEPARTMENT301 S. COLLEGE STREETCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telephone communication services; Providing Internet access; Cable and satellite television transmission services | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |