USPTO serial 90978938
MUSCLE LOAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAYABYAB, EDWARD TAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUSCLE LOAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa A. Nowak, Reg. No. 68,088
Melissa A. Nowak, Reg. No. 68,088 Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices, namely, data sensors being biometric data sensors, transmitters and receivers for relaying physical exercisedata; Electronic monitoring devices incorporating microprocessors, digital display, and accelerometers for detecting, storing,reporting, monitoring, uploading and downloading sport activity, namely, team and individual athletic training, competition, andfitness training data, namely, time, pace, speed, acceleration, velocity, exertion, and physical position to the internet and personalcomputers; Cases and straps for electronic monitoring devices; Computer interfaces being computer hardware and downloadableand recorded software for receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data monitored by biometric sensors to be used withbiometric monitors for athletic use; Electronic data sensors for shirts, shorts, pants, socks, sports bras for scientific use in thenature of health monitoring devices, namely, biometric data sensors that capture and communicate data, namely, time, pace,speed, acceleration, velocity, exertion, and physical position to the user, not for medical purposes; Articles of clothing withintegrated biometric data sensors that capture and communicate data, namely, time, pace, speed, acceleration, velocity, exertion,and physical position to the user, not for medical purposes; Computer hardware and recorded computer software used for motionanalysis; Computer hardware and biometric data sensors for 3-dimensional motion tracking and character animation and industrialcontrol and stabilization; Motion capture systems, consisting of motion tracking devices and recorded software; Inertialmeasurement units comprised of gyroscopes, accelerometers and magnetometers, and recorded software for inertial movementanalysis for use therewith; Systems for measurement of joint angles, consisting of inertial measurement units comprised ofgyroscopes, accelerometers and magnetometers and recorded software for inertial movement analysis for use therewith; Systemsfor measurement of motion, orientation and position, consisting of inertial measurement units comprised of gyroscopes,accelerometers and magnetometers, and recorded software for inertial movement analysis for use therewith; Systems formeasuring body posture, consisting of measuring devices for measuring body posture and recorded software for measuring bodyposture; Systems for measuring of motion, orientation and position, consisting of measuring devices for measuring motion,orientation and position and recorded software for measuring motion, orientation and position, namely, systems for measuringjoint angles; Recorded software for computation, editing, analysis, and visualization of body posture; Recorded software for theanalysis of sports training; Recorded software for assisting in the design of sports equipment; Electronic sports training simulators,namely, computer hardware and recorded software-based teaching apparatus in the nature of monitoring and analyzing individualathletic training, competition, and fitness training data, namely, time, pace, speed, acceleration, velocity, exertion, and physicalposition | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |