USPTO serial 90979856
RECONSTRUCTIVE LUMPECTOMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURCH, JILLIAN RENEE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RECONSTRUCTIVE LUMPECTOMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marlborough, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Odette Martins
Odette Martins SUNSTEIN LLP100 HIGH STREETBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Training in the field of breast health, surgical techniques, and surgical technology for breast surgeons, radiologists, and radiation oncologists; Educational services, namely, online courses, workshops, non-downloadable webinars, and seminars in the field of breast health, surgical techniques, and surgical technology for breast surgeons, radiologists, and radiation oncologists; Panel discussions in the field of breast health, surgical technology, and surgical techniques for breast surgeons, radiologists, and radiation oncologists; Educational demonstrations and lecture presentations in the field of breast health, surgical techniques, and surgical technology for breast surgeons, radiologists, and radiation oncologists; Providing on-line non downloadable videos and non-downloadable publications in the nature of brochures in the field of breast health, surgical techniques, and surgical technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Breast cancer surgery services; Oncoplastic breast surgery services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |