USPTO serial 97001237
THRIVUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALBANO, ASHLEY C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THRIVUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ness Ziona, IL
Ness Ziona, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN D. MCCARTHY
KEVIN D. MCCARTHY ROACH BROWN MCCARTHY & GRUBER, P.C.424 MAIN STREET1920 LIBERTY BUILDINGBUFFALO, NY 14202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Seed preparations in the nature of seed treatment biostimulants and seed treatment bioinoculants for agricultural and horticultural use; Biological stimulants being plant growth stimulants; Biological stimulants being soil inoculants for horticultural use; Biological stimulants for use as a seed treatment for agricultural use; Biological preparations for use in the agricultural industry; Bio-stimulants being plant growth stimulants and soil inoculants for agricultural use; Agricultural and horticultural fertilizers, namely, start-up seed treatments; Chemical preparations for treating agricultural seeds for improving plant growth and warding off pests and disease; Agricultural chemicals, except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides; Fertilizers; Micronutrients for use as fertilizers; Microbial and fungal inoculants for application to seeds, application in-furrow, application as foliar treatment to plants for use in the agricultural industry; Inoculants, namely, biological microorganisms used for improving plant growth; Adjuvants for use with agricultural chemicals; Adjuvants for use with biological microorganisms for agricultural, horticultural, post-harvest uses; Adjuvants for use in the agricultural industry" | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |