Drawing for SNACKRUPTORS

USPTO serial 97001645

SNACKRUPTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 672
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STURMAN, MELISSA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNACKRUPTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul W. Reidl

Paul W. Reidl Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bread; Cakes; Cookies; Crackers; Cupcakes; Flat bread; Muffins; Bakery goods; Bakery products; Bread and pastry; Bread sticks; Cup cakes; Naan bread; Pita chips; Pizza crust; Pretzel chips; Pretzels; Snack cakes; Corn-based snack foods; Crisp bread; Flour-based chips; Grain-based chips; Grain-based snack foods; Pita bread; Wheat-based snack foodsACTIVEApr 30, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2026RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
May 30, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Feb 10, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2025CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2025SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2025IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 18, 2025EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 10, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2025EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2025EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 17, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 15, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 8, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 6, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 20, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance