USPTO serial 97002352
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fort Lauderdale, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren Spielman
Darren Spielman THE CONCEPT LAW GROUP, P.A.6400 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 500FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Maintaining escrow accounts for purchase, sale, refinance and tax deferred property exchange transactions; real estate escrow services; financial transaction settlement services | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2019 |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to facilitate the preparation and organization of loan closing documents, closing services for mortgage loans, real estate closing services, real estate settlement services, title searching, financial transaction closing services, escrow services and financial transaction settlement services | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2019 |
| 045 | Closing services for mortgage loans; preparing and organizing loan closing documents; title searching; real estate closing services; real estate settlement services; providing information via a website regarding the preparation and organization of loan closing documents, closing services for mortgage loans, real estate closing services, real estate settlement services, title searching, financial transaction closing services, escrow services and settlement services | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2019 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |