Drawing for RADBOT

USPTO serial 97003511

RADBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALLEN, MACKENZIE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R Menker

James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial robots; Industrial robots for use in the nuclear industry; Industrial robots for the remote handling of materials in radiological and hazardous environments; Industrial robots for use in radiological and hazardous industrial environmentsACTIVE—
037Maintenance of nuclear power plants, equipment and instruments for energy productionACTIVE—
040Treatment of nuclear waste; Detoxification and decontamination of radiological and hazardous materials; Destruction of wasteACTIVE—
042Nuclear engineering services; Engineering design services; Scientific and industrial analysis and research for the energy industry; Environmental assessment services, namely, consulting services in the field of environmental assessmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 24, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 13, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 5, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 31, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2023GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2023GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2023CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 12, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance