CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE BRAND THAT INNOVATES WHO THEY WANNA REPLICATE

USPTO serial 97010784

THE BRAND THAT INNOVATES WHO THEY WANNA REPLICATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BRAND THAT INNOVATES WHO THEY WANNA REPLICATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Derek Fahey

Derek Fahey The Plus IP Firm101 NE 3rd Avenue, Suite 1500Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair gel; Hair edge control in the form of gel; Hair detangling preparations; Hair wax; Hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; Heat protectant sprays for hair; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Hair oils; Oils for hair conditioning; Styling foam for hair; Hair mousse; Hair relaxers; Hair spray; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair piece bonding glue; False eyelashes; Artificial eyelashes; Adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; Glue removers; Hair coloring and dyes; Hair coloring preparations; Coloring lotions for the hairACTIVE—
026Wigs; Hair pieces and wigs; Hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair, namely, synthetic braiding hair, human hair, and human braiding hair; Hair pieces; Hair extensionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 8, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance