USPTO serial 97011156
THREAT INFORMATICS CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THREAT INFORMATICS CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milton C. Johns
Milton C. Johns Executive Law Partners, PLLC11130 Fairfax Boulevard, Suite 303Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research, development and engineering, installation, technical validation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Development of computer software for simulation of intrusion attacks; research, development and engineering of computer network, security software, technical validation of procedures for computer network security and related reporting thereon; consultation in the field of developing computer software, computer networks and information technology infrastructure; computer and data security consultation, namely, consultation in the field of assessment, detection, protection and security of computer data and electronic information, of computer networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure, all against attack, intrusion, unauthorized activity, misuse and other anomalous events; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of problems in computer security networks and information technology infrastructures; computer and data security services, namely, analysis, evaluation, and testing of computer networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure for attack, intrusion, unauthorized activity, misuse and other anomalous events; computer and data security services, namely, identifying attacks, intrusions, unauthorized activities, misuses and anomalous events in computer networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure; computer and data security services, namely, remote monitoring of computer data information and computer networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure for detection of and protection against attack, intrusion and misuse and other anomalous events, including deployment of countermeasures in response to detection of unauthorized access or use of computer data and information, networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure; computer and data security services, namely, assessment of vulnerabilities of computer data and information, and computer networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure to attacks, intrusion, unauthorized activity, misuse and other anomalous events; computer and data security services, namely, providing early warnings, advisory alerts, notifications, and reports of attacks, security events, unauthorized activity, misuse and other anomalous events in a computer system or network, potential exploits and vulnerabilities for computer data and information, and computer networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure; conducting research in the field of computer and data security, namely, research relating to assessment of computer data and information, computer networks, servers, applications, desktop computers and information technology infrastructure to detect and protect against attack, intrusion, unauthorized activity, misuse and other anomalous events; Computer security services, namely monitoring computer networks for technical validation and reporting of computer network security and electronic information risks; Computer security services, namely, simulation of computer network security incidents; computer and data security services, namely providing computer security monitoring against vulnerabilities, attacks, intrusions, unauthorized activities, misuse and other anomalous events; validation of information in the nature of scientific research and analysis in the field of computer and data security, namely, vulnerability assessment and protection of computer data and electronic information, computer networks, servers, applications, and desktop computers and information technology infrastructure against vulnerabilities, attack, intrusion, unauthorized activity, misuse and other anomalous events | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |