USPTO serial 97012195
HONEY BAE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HONEY BAE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bakersfield, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Duncan
James M. Duncan SCANLON DUNCAN LLPP.O. BOX 10359BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin; non-medicated wrinkle removing and moisturizing skin care preparations; Topical herbal extracts for cosmetic purposes; all the foregoing containing CBD and extracts solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry-weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Tobacco products, namely, cigarette smoke filters, tobacco pipes, smoker's rolling trays, cigarette lighters, and tobacco grinders; electronic cigarettes, vaping cigarettes in the nature of electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers for smokers, cigars, pipes being tobacco pipes, water pipes of glass; cigar and cigarette boxes; cigar and cigarette boxes not of precious metal; tobacco pipe boxes; electronic cigarettes; smoking alternatives, namely, smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe; electronic smoking vaporizers, namely, electronic cigarettes; electronic cigars; electronic cigarette atomizers sold empty, electronic cigarette cartomizers being combination electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers, sold as a component of electronic cigarettes, and refill liquid nicotine solutions comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges, sold as a unit; oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe; any CBD in the goods being solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; All of the aforementioned goods solely intended for use with tobacco or hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | online retail store services and wholesale distributorship services, featuring smoker's articles and electronic cigarette products and accessories, namely, cigarettes, cigars, humidors, matches, rolling papers, rolling trays, lighters, electronic cigarette refill cartridges, flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges, cigar boxes, cigar clippers, torch lighters, flavorings for use in electronic cigarettes, batteries for electronic cigarettes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |