USPTO serial 97014904
BABZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Saul Benjamin Abrams
Saul Benjamin Abrams FIELD LLP400-444 7 AVE SWCALGARY, AB, T2P0X8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Veggie burger patties; mixes for veggie burger patties; vegetarian meatballs; mixes for vegetarian meatballs; vegetarian meatloaf; mixes for vegetarian meatloaf ; vegetarian chili con carne; mixes for vegetarian chili con carne; vegetarian sloppy joes; mixes for vegetarian sloppy joes; legume salads; mixes for legume salads ; fruit toppings; nut toppings; salad toppings; yogurt; mixes for falafel; sunflower seeds; prepared hemp seeds; roasted nuts; seed butters; almond butter; cashew nut butter; peanut butter; (Based on Intent to Use) vegetarian taco filling; mixes for vegetarian taco filling; vegetarian sausages; seasonings; meat substitutes; formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |