Drawing for PRM

USPTO serial 97015341

PRM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VO, KOMAL MAKHDOOM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Kattman

Daniel E. Kattman REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.1000 N. WATER STREET, SUITE 1700MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Retail store shelf and display case moving systems and shelf moving systems, comprising hand operated lifting jacks and jack assemblies, mounting brackets, storage container, and castersACTIVE—
012Retail store shelf and display case moving systems and shelf moving systems, comprising wheeled platforms as dollies, and jack assemblies, mounting brackets, storage container, and casters, speed skates as dollies; and dollies; pallet rack moving systems and comprising dollies and jack assemblies, mounting brackets, storage container, and casters; office furniture moving systems and comprising dollies and jack assemblies, mounting brackets, storage container, and castersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 4, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 8, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2023PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 3, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 3, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 3, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance