Drawing for SUPREME

USPTO serial 97016704

SUPREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gloria Tsui-Yip

Gloria Tsui-Yip Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C.270 Madison AvenueSuite 1403New York, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Modeling clayACTIVEJun 1, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance