Drawing for INTEGRITAS ENERGY FINANCE

USPTO serial 97017064

INTEGRITAS ENERGY FINANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUNDAGE, DAVID WILLIAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRITAS ENERGY FINANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle D. Kahn

Michelle D. Kahn SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CENTER, 17TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financing of sustainable business initiative projects, namely, renewable energy power generation, energy storage, water purification and desalinization projectsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 14, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance