USPTO serial 97019668
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas J. Gingo
Nicholas J. Gingo RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVE.19TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive touch screen terminals; Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for scientific research; Wireless radio apparatus for vehicles; Steering apparatus, automatic, for vehicles, namely, electronic remote controls for operating steering wheels of vehicles; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; Vehicle battery; Anti-theft warning apparatus, namely, anti-theft alarms | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Anti-thief devices for vehicles; Child safety seat (for vehicles); Upholstery for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Vehicle repair information; Installation and repair of heating equipment; Installation and maintenance of lighting facility; Machinery installation, maintenance and repair; Vehicle maintenance; Vehicle breakdown repair services; Vehicle battery charging; Vehicle service stations; Land vehicle maintenance and repair services; Retreading of tires | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |