USPTO serial 97020159
SNAPPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOZEAU, BRANDON THOMAS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNAPPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURI S THOMPSON
LAURI S THOMPSON GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP10845 GRIFFITH PEAK DRIVESUITE 600LAS VEGAS, NV 89135Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for designing, creating, hosting, customizing, modifying, maintaining and updating websites and web pages for others on a global computer network, mobile devices and social media sites and applications; application services provider (ASP) featuring software for use in designing, creating, hosting, customizing, modifying, maintaining and updating websites and web pages of others on a global computer network, mobile devices and social media sites and applications; cloud computing featuring software for use by others in designing, creating, customizing, modifying, maintaining and updating websites and web pages on a global computer network, mobile devices and social media sites and applications; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; developing and hosting a server on a global computer network for the purpose of facilitating e-commerce transactions; providing on-line non-downloadable software for supporting and managing the creation and sending of bulk electronic mail which customers can use to design and send email advertising and promotional campaigns and to manage such campaigns; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use by others to customize, modify, maintain and update websites and web pages on a global computer network, mobile devices and social media sites and applications; | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2025 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |