Drawing for THROWBACK NATURAL LEAF CIGARS GRAPE CHERRY BLIZZ

USPTO serial 97020997

THROWBACK NATURAL LEAF CIGARS GRAPE CHERRY BLIZZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELCH, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THROWBACK NATURAL LEAF CIGARS GRAPE CHERRY BLIZZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Roncayolo Betancourt

David Roncayolo Betancourt ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT & GILCHRIST, P.A.1221 BRICKELL AVENUE, SUITE 2400MIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034CigarsACTIVEJul 31, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 18, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 3, 2022EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 27, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance