USPTO serial 97021009
ORGANICPERCENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORGANICPERCENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jeonju-si,Jeollabuk-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M Joseph
THOMAS M JOSEPH THOMAS M. JOSEPH, ESQ.P.O. BOX 14789PITTSBURGH, PA 15234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Make-up; Perfumes; Anti-wrinkle cream; Anti-wrinkle creams; Beauty balm creams; Beauty serums; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetic nourishing creams; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Essential oils; Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, functional cosmetics being skin care preparations; Non-medicated toiletry preparations; Scented body lotions and creams; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |