USPTO serial 97021610
DATA ETHNOGRAPHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WANG, YUAN YUAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATA ETHNOGRAPHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W LEWIS
GEORGE W LEWIS WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP8500 LEESBURG PIKESUITE 7500TYSONS, VA 22182Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Rental of web servers; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for algorithm software for computer operation and control; cloud computing, namely, providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing}; hosting computer websites rental of computer software for computer operation and control ; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for rental of computers; server hosting; electronic data storage; providing online non-downloadable} computer programs on data networks for computer operation and control monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; development of computer platforms; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; computer system design; computer security consultancy; computer software consultancy in computer software design; consultancy in computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; Computer software maintenance; recovery of computer data; installation of computer software; duplication of computer programs; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; creating or maintaining web sites for others; website design consultancy; off-site data; user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; software development in the framework of software publishing; data security consultancy; data encryption services; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; user authentication services using technology for ecommerce transactions; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; digitization of documents, namely, scanning; computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software}; providing online non-downloadable software for computer operation and control technological advice relating to computers, automobiles and industrial machines; computer technology consultancy; information technology (IT) consultancy International | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |