USPTO serial 97029046
TIKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRICKLAND, CODY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN K. ROBBINS II
Glenn K. Robbins II SPENCER FANE LLPSUITE 10001 NORTH BRENTWOOD BOULEVARDST. LOUIS, MO 63105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purpose; Non-metal and non-leather key chains; Plastic key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Water squirting toys; Water toys; Inflatable float hammocks for recreational use in water; Action figures; Action skill games; Target games; Puzzles; Manipulative games; Party games; Game controllers for computer games; Balloons; Hand-held party poppers; Paper party favors; Paper party hats; Piñatas; Play sets for action figures; Playing cards and card games; Role playing games; Toy guns; Toy stuffed animals; Toy weapons; Toy water guns; Toy vehicles; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toys, namely, children's dress-up accessories; bobblehead dolls; collectable toy figures; dolls; doll playsets; plush toys; stuffed toys; toy action figures and accessories therefor; toy building blocks; toy figures; bendable toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |