USPTO serial 97029262
Serial No. 97029262
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 97029262?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Severna Park, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruy Garcia-Zamor
Ruy Garcia-Zamor GARCIA-ZAMOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, LLC12960 LINDEN CHURCH RD.CLARKSVILLE, MD 21029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Oyster openers; Oyster shuckers; Oyster knives; Hand tools, namely, oyster shell crackers; Hand-operated oyster shell crackers; Hand-operated oyster shell snipper; Household appliance, namely, portable oyster openers; Household appliance, namely, lever operated oyster openers with integrated snipper and appliance base; Household appliance, namely, lever operated oyster openers which support the oysters laterally during opening to reduce the spilling of natural oyster juice therefrom; Portable, lever operated oyster openers which support the oysters laterally during opening to reduce the spilling of natural oyster juice therefrom; Oyster opener with replaceable blade; Replacement blades for oyster openers; Replacement parts for oyster openers | ACTIVE | May 25, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |