USPTO serial 97030671
EVEREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVEREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Curtis Edmondson
J. CURTIS EDMONDSON LAW OFFICES OF J. CURTIS EDMONDSON15490 NW OAK HILLS DRBEAVERTON, OR 97006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biometric software; Biometric identification systems; Computer software for use as an application programming interface (API); Software applications; Platform software; Application software; Programming software; System software; Data processing software; E-commerce software; E-commerce and e-payment software; Mobile application software; E-payment software; Online payment software; Downloadable computer software applications; Application software for smart phones; Software for arranging online transactions; Computer software relating to the handling of financial transactions; Software for processing electronic payments to and from others; Computer software for facilitating payment transactions by electronic means; Computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; Computer e-commerce software; Data storage devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Certification of data via blockchain; Data authentication via blockchain; Development of software; Developing computer software; Computer software design; Software design and development; Design of computer software; Computer software design and development; Design, development and implementation of software; Design and development of computer software; Programming of software for e-commerce platforms; Design and development of data processing software; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Providing user authentication services using biometric hardware and software technology for e-commerce transactions; Electronic data storage; Electronic storage of documents; Electronic data storage and data back- up services; Hosting of e-commerce platforms on the Internet; Maintenance of software used in the field of e-commerce; Hosting of transaction platforms on the internet; Online data storage; Computerised data storage; Computerised data storage services; Electronic storage of medical records | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |