USPTO serial 97030805
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelli Ovies
Kelli Ovies WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP555 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 1100RALEIGH, NC 27601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bagged cut fruit; Bagged cut vegetables; Bagged sliced fruit; Bagged sliced vegetables; Bottled cut fruit; Bottled cut vegetables; Bottled sliced fruit; Bottled sliced vegetables; Canned cut fruit; Canned cut vegetables; Canned fruits and vegetables; Canned sliced fruit; Canned sliced vegetables; Freeze-dried fruits; Freeze-dried vegetables; Frozen fruits; Frozen vegetables; Preserved fruits and vegetables; Processed berries; Processed cherries; Processed collard greens; Processed lettuce; Processed mustard greens; Processed turnip greens; Processed vegetables and fruits | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |