USPTO serial 97031640
AIRGLIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHUBERT, HEATHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRGLIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan D. Ricks
Ryan D. Ricks Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.1 East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Airflow systems for vertical farming applications, namely, air circulation systems comprised of ventilation devices and control devices, namely, electronic control circuits for electric fans, measuring and control devices for air conditioning technology, and climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, ventilation control devices, and remote controls for ventilation devices, for use in vertical farming for the growth of non-marijuana plants and for the growth of cannabis plants with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and exclusively for use in making hemp and cannabidiol (CBD) products; controlled air circulation systems, comprised of ventilation devices and control devices, namely, electronic control circuits for electric fans, measuring and control devices for air conditioning technology, and climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, ventilation control devices, and remote controls for ventilation devices, for use in vertical farming for the growth of non-marijuana plants and for the growth of cannabis plants with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and exclusively for use in making hemp and cannabidiol (CBD) products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2023 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |