USPTO serial 97037247
VCC VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROLLERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AREY, BRANDON LEON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VCC VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROLLERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrian Resendez
ADRIAN RESENDEZ BROUGH & RESENDEZ PLLC1213 W. SLAUGHTER LANE, SUITE 100AUSTIN, TX 78748UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Accounting and bookkeeping services for those in the construction industry; Construction project cost analyses; Business project management for construction projects; Business management consulting services for those in the construction industry; Bookkeeping; Accounting advisory services; Accounting consultation; Accounting consultation for those in the construction industry; Accounting services; Business management; Business management services for those in the construction industry; Business management analysis; Business management consultation; Business management consulting; Financial auditing; Financial auditing services for those in the construction industry; Financial records management; Financial records management for those in the construction industry; Administrative accounting; Business information and accounting advisory services; Business information and accounting advisory services for those in the construction industry; Computerized accounting services; Computerized accounting services for those in the construction industry; Consulting and information concerning accounting; Consulting and information concerning accounting for those in the construction industry; Consulting services, namely, expert analysis and management consulting in economics and accounting; Consulting services, namely, expert analysis and management consulting in economics and accounting for those in the construction industry; Cost accounting; Construction cost accounting; Economic forecasting and analysis; Economic forecasting services; Economic forecasting and analysis for those in the construction industry; Economic forecasting services for those in the construction industry; Preparing financial reports for others for business or commercial purposes | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |