Drawing for ASCEND

USPTO serial 97043785

ASCEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOLFE, YOUNG J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASCEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristen Mollnow Walsh

Kristen Mollnow Walsh Nixon Peabody LLP1300 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Printing machines for commercial or industrial uses; printing presses; digital printing machines for industrial or commercial use; digital color electronic printing presses; pressroom machines for industrial or commercial use, namely, mechanical devices for the in-feed and the delivery of printing materials other than currency, non-wovens and textiles into printing machines; industrial machines not for office use, namely, machines to cut, lacquer, fold, perforate, stitch, sort, stack, punch and block or die-stamp printed products; processing machines for printed paper; structural replacement parts of the foregoing machines; sheet-fed electrophotographic press for printing signage and packaging applications; roll-fed electrophotographic press for printing narrow format label applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 7, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance