Drawing for XLR

USPTO serial 97047503

XLR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
INGRAM, KYLE G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XLR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeana Sciarappa Schott, Esq.

Jeana Sciarappa Schott, Esq. SCIARAPPA SCHOTT IP, PLC36 ANDIAMONEWPORT COAST, CA 92657UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective safety helmet for sport and motorsport, namely, motorcycling, motor cross, motor bikes, motor scooters, scooters, dirt bikes, go-carts, bicycling; protective riding helmet for any form of land, road, or dirt-based transport, sport or recreational use, with all of the foregoing excluding protective riding helmets designed or promoted specifically for aerospace transportACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 14, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 9, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 21, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance