USPTO serial 97052834
XPRESSO TEST BY MOCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XPRESSO TEST BY MOCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenfield Park, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer software for cognitive function screening in the nature of electronic, audio and textual tests | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, printed test forms in the field of cognitive function screening and assessment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a secured-access, members only website featuring technology that gives members the ability to access cognitive test data, cognitive test reports, non-downloadable software for cognitive screening tests, and digital manuals for cognitive screening tests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |