USPTO serial 97054272
EXERTIS JAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLONCH, ABIGAIL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXERTIS JAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baie D'Urfé, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Dunn Wessberg
Ann Dunn Wessberg Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.200 South Sixth StreetSuite 4000Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring consumer electronic products, consumer mobile communication devices and accessories, pro audio and visual products and systems, professional audio products for recording, public address and amplification, multimedia and home audio and video products, home theater surround sound systems, record turntables, audio receivers and audio amplifiers, headphones, wireless headphones, car audio systems, subwoofers for vehicles, car radios, loudspeakers with built-in amplifiers, portable wireless audio speakers, battery chargers for cellphones, carrying cases for cellphones, interactive augmented reality globe, interactive touch screen terminals, and computer games for use on tablets; Distributorship services featuring consumer electronic products, consumer mobile communication devices and accessories, pro audio and visual products and systems, professional audio products for recording, public address and amplification, multimedia and home audio and video products, home theater surround sound systems, record turntables, audio receivers and audio amplifiers, headphones, wireless headphones, car audio systems, subwoofers for vehicles, car radios, loudspeakers with built-in amplifiers, portable wireless audio speakers, battery chargers for cellphones, carrying cases for cellphones, interactive augmented reality globe, interactive touch screen terminals, and computer games for use on tablets; Retail store services featuring smart home products and solutions, TVs and projectors, drones, drone video systems, digital signage, video conferencing products, unified communications products and systems, projectors and displays; Distributorship services featuring smart home products and solutions, TVs and projectors, drones, drone video systems, digital signage, video conferencing products, unified communications products and systems, projectors and displays; Retail store services featuring mobile living products and solutions including cooktops, kitchen appliances, solar energy solutions, entertainment systems, speakers, LED TVs and power cables for home, RVs and yachts; Distributorship services featuring mobile living products and solutions including cooktops, kitchen appliances, solar energy solutions, entertainment systems, speakers, LED TVs and power cables for home, RVs and yachts; Retail store services featuring photo products and solutions; Distributorship services featuring photo products and solutions; Retail store services featuring home entertainment electronics; Distributorship services featuring home entertainment electronics; Retail store services featuring musical instruments; Distributorship services featuring musical instruments; Retail store services featuring lighting products and fixtures; Distributorship services featuring lighting products and fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |