USPTO serial 97055048
RUSSELL HOBBS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUSSELL HOBBS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey P. Dunning
Jeffrey P. Dunning Greenberg Traurig, LLP360 North Green Street, Suite 1300Chicago, IL 60607United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric salt and pepper mills; electric blenders for household purposes; electric jug blenders for household purposes; electric mixers for household purposes; electric food processors; electric food choppers; electric juicer components, namely, juicer pushers, juicer lids, juicer pulp guards, juicer receptacles, juicer filters, juicer pulp collectors, juicer cleaning heads and juicer spouts | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Table cutlery; electric irons; steam irons | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scales | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric cookware, namely, sous vide cookers; electric home appliances, namely, coffeemakers, espresso makers, kettles, toasters, air fryers, slow cookers, multicookers, rice cookers, sandwich makers, panini makers, bread makers, mini/countertop ovens, food steamers; removable drawers for use with home appliances, namely, air fryer drawers; electric blankets not for medical purposes; dehumidifiers; home appliances, namely, garment steamers and steam generators | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Containers for household or kitchen use; household or kitchen utensils, namely, ladles for kitchen use, spatulas for kitchen use, and servingware for serving food and drinks; household or kitchen tools and implements, namely, cooking skewers, blades specially adapted for kitchen grinders, filter baskets being baskets for household purposes, scoops for household purposes, non-electric frothers for household purposes, drip collectors in the nature of trays for use with home appliances to catch drips, jar sealers in the nature of lids that have a port for an external vacuum hose for vacuum sealing resealable containers, cleaning brushes for household use, pasta-shaping discs in the nature of non-electric pasta makers for household purposes, pizza stones, and fetch tools for removing rotisserie spit, cooking skewers or rotating baskets from air fryers; non-electric cookware, namely, bakeware, pots, pans, lids for pots and pans, baskets, crispers for household purposes in the nature of a tray that helps air circulation when air frying food, trays, grill plates, griddle plates, rotisserie stands, rotisserie shafts and rotisserie sets comprising rotisserie shafts and rotisserie forks; bakeware; non-electric food steamers; hand-operated salt and pepper mills; dishware; drinkware; beverage glassware; serving trays; cutting boards and carving boards; knife blocks; baskets for household purposes; ironing boards and ironing board covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPECTRUM BRANDS (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SPECTRUM BRANDS (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RUSSELL HOBBS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2026 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2026 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2025 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |