USPTO serial 97059511
SPATIAL PATHOLOGY POWERS PRECISION THERAPEUTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPATIAL PATHOLOGY POWERS PRECISION THERAPEUTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria D Summerfield
Victoria D Summerfield TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP501 GRANT STREET, SUITE 300, UNION TRUSTPITTSBURGH, PA 15219United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring web based pathology software, namely, web based image analysis that defines the spatial relationships between cells and molecules within tissue microenvironments to aid in the interpretation of patient tissue samples; SAAS services featuring software for performing image analysis in the field of pathology, namely, in connection with transmitted light microscopy and fluorescence microscopy; SAAS services featuring software for viewing and managing images and for digital pathology image management; SAAS services featuring software for use in cancer diagnosis, namely, software to predict metastatic potential in primary solid tumors; SAAS services featuring web based software for viewing, annotating, analyzing, and scoring digital slides, for consolidating case information, a score, results, a diagnosis, comments, and digital images into a pathology case report, for generating, exporting, and printing pathology case reports, and for providing audit trails in the field of pathology; SAAS services featuring web based software for remotely managing pathology images, for remotely managing pathology images and metadata, and for creating, assigning, and managing pathology cases; providing an online searchable database of images for evaluating machine learning algorithms for computational pathology, for scientific research purposes and medical research purposes; medical research, namely, pathology evaluations utilizing image analysis algorithms; medical and scientific research and consultation in the field of cancer treatment and diagnosis; medical and scientific research and consultation in the field of medical imaging; SAAS services featuring computer software for use in image analysis of digital images of tissue samples acquired by optical microscopy; SAAS services featuring computer software for creating tissue-based image analysis algorithms; and SAAS services featuring data-processing software for tissue-based image analysis using algorithms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PREDXBIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SpIntellx, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SpIntellx, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPATIAL PATHOLOGY POWERS PRECISION THERAPEUTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |