Drawing for TRUEHAPTICS

USPTO serial 97060482

TRUEHAPTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WUDARSKY, MINDY CHEK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUEHAPTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah J. Peckham

Deborah J. Peckham BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 HIGH ST.BOSTON, MA 02110United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Medical simulators for use as teaching aids for purposes of training and evaluation for endoscopy, laparoscopy, and minimally invasive surgical procedures; medical equipment for use as teaching aids comprised of virtual reality technology, computer hardware, recorded computer software and haptic-enabled platform for use in endoscopic training and evaluation; medical diagnostic simulators for use as teaching aids for evaluation for endoscopy, laparoscopy, and minimally invasive surgical proceduresACTIVE—
010Medical endoscopes; flexible medical endoscopes; endoscopic equipment for medical purposes; Medical devices, namely, endoscopes for minimally invasive procedures; medical devices and instruments, namely, devices used in orthopedic and laparoscopic surgeries and diagnostic evaluations; endoscopes for arthroscopic, laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery and diagnosis; Medical imaging apparatus; medical imaging apparatus incorporating preinstalled medical imaging software; medical imaging apparatus for use in medical procedures; medical imaging apparatus for use in minimally invasive and orthopedic surgery and for arthroscopic and laparoscopic imaging and for diagnostic proceduresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 11, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance