Drawing for KINLEY

USPTO serial 97063849

KINLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELMAN, JESSE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KINLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew Saunders

MATTHEW SAUNDERS SAUNDERS & SILVERSTEIN LLP14 CEDAR STREET SUITE 224AMESBURY, MA 01913UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal building materials; extruded goods of metal; fabricated goods of metal; metal building materials for use in horticulture; metal building materials for use in landscaping; metal extrusions and fabrications for use in landscaping; metal extrusions and fabrications for edging and formation of paths and hard surface areas; metal lawn edging; metal paver restraints; metal restraints for the enclosure and segregation of materials for landscapes; metal restraints for the enclosure and segregation of materials for roof gardens; metallic planters for trees; metallic planters for plants; green wall systems of metal; metal edging systems for paths, roads and driveways; metal fabrications for setting out buildings; metal fabrications for setting out of landscapes; joining pieces; metallic strips for horticulture and landscaping; ironmongery and fittings associated with these goodsACTIVE—
019Non-metallic building materials; non-metallic strips used in horticulture and landscaping; wood plastic composite products for decking; wood plastic composite products for horticulture; wood plastic composite products for landscaping; plastic pedestals; porcelain tilesACTIVE—
042Design services; design of metallic and non-metallic products for landscaping and horticulture projects; design of bespoke metallic and non-metallic products for landscaping and horticulture projectsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance