USPTO serial 97064747
GLO STRANDZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, BRIA MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLO STRANDZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Josiah Harris
Josiah Harris HARRIS SHEPHERD LAW GROUP, PLLC90 CHURCH STREET #2319NEW YORK, NY 10007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair shampoos; 3-in-1 organic non-medicated soap bars for use as soap, shampoo and conditioner; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and make-up; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleansers; Facial cleansing milk; Facial cream; Facial lotion; Facial make-up; Facial moisturizers; Facial oils; Facial washes; Hair care creams; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, serums, oils, moisturizers, gels, sprays, pomades, creams, drops, waxes; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair care products, namely, heat protection sprays; Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Nail care kits comprising nail polish; Nail care preparations; Nail cosmetics; Nail cream; Nail enamel; Nail polish; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Shampoo bars; Shampoo-conditioners; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Beauty masks; Body scrubs; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for hair care; Dry shampoos; Exfoliating scrubs for cosmetic purposes; Eyebrow cosmetics; Eyelash extensions; Facial scrubs; Foot scrubs; Foot masks for skin care; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioner bars; Hair conditioners for babies; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair rinses; Hair weave shampoo-conditioners; Hand scrubs; Leave-in hair conditioners; Lip conditioners; Non-medicated skin care creams and lotions; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Non-medicated hair, skin, and nail care preparations; Skin conditioners; Wig shampoo-conditioners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |