Drawing for R4D

USPTO serial 97065165

R4D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEAUDRY-TORRES, FAITH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with R4D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Mitnick

David Mitnick MITNICK, P.C.545 W110TH STREET 7ANEW YORK, NY 10025United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software to enable users to access online courses of instruction on a variety of topics, namely, baking, dessert preparations, and cookingACTIVEAug 1, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2023CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2023SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 6, 2023IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 6, 2023EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 29, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 28, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2023NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 2023IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2023INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jan 26, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 23, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance