USPTO serial 97065536
SKAYL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKAYL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westminster, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabrielle M. Morlock
Gabrielle M. Morlock SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.1 SOUTH CHURCH AVENUESUITE 1500TUCSON, AZ 85701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, downloadable software for customizable application and computer system integration, and data management; Computer software, namely, downloadable software for connecting, operating, and managing networked devices, namely, air, ground, and sea vehicles, command and control computer systems, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) computer systems, in the internet of things (IoT) | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2017 |
| 042 | Computer software, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for application and computer system integration, and data management; Computer software, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloudbased software for connecting, operating and managing networked devices, namely, air, ground, and sea vehicles, command and control computer systems, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) computer systems, in the internet of things (iot); Computer systems integration services; Consulting services in the field of computer software for application and computer system integration, and data management; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for system integration, and data management; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for data management and system integration | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |