USPTO serial 97067093
EXERGY GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXERGY GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pollie Gautsch, Esq.
Pollie Gautsch, Esq. G&A LEGAL, APC665 SAN RODOLFO 124-209SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Recorded computer game software; Downloadable computer game software and downloadable manuals in electronic format sold as a unit; Downloadable computer game software, downloadable via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable computer games programs; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of strategy guides in the field of computer games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of online, non- downloadable electronic, computer and video games provided by means of the Internet; Internet games, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games via the internet; Electronic games services provided by means of the Internet or other communication network; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Provision of on-line entertainment information in the field of computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable video game software; Multimedia entertainment software production services; Publishing interactive computer and video game software | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2023 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |