CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TABLETOP

USPTO serial 97068963

TABLETOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EUBANK, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TABLETOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Brown

Jeffrey H. Brown MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP444 W. LAKE STREET, SUITE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Magnetic bit holders being accessories for power drills and power drivers; and drill stoppers for power drillsACTIVE—
009bubble levelsACTIVE—
016writing instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2026EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2026RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2026EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2026DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 22, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2024INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 5, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 5, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2023EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 19, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 29, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 27, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance