Drawing for PURAFY CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 97070881

PURAFY CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PURAFY CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Mark Kaden

Jeffrey Mark Kaden GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, P.C.270 MADISON AVENUE8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Consultation and research in the fields of water treatment, water filtration, water conservation, water recycling, air filtrationACTIVE—
042Advisory services in the field of product developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 5, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Sep 10, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 27, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2024GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2024GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2024CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 30, 2023GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2023GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2023CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance