Drawing for NIKITA KNIGHT

USPTO serial 97073150

NIKITA KNIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIKITA KNIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ryan A. Bethell

Ryan A. Bethell The Ideas Law Firm, PLLC975 E. Dava Dr.Tempe, AZ 85283United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, wrestling exhibits and performances by a professional wrestler and entertainer, all the aforesaid to exclude adult entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 3, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2022RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Oct 13, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2022GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2022GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2022EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jul 18, 2022CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance